Skip to main content

Think before start selecting a Topic

Post a Comment

How to write the description of the instrumentation section?



Description of the Research 

Instrumentation 


The description of the research instrumentation section of the project should present a detailed analysis and description of each questionnaire and test used in the project. Typically, two to three pages should be sufficient to describe each questionnaire. 

For each questionnaire, you should discuss each of the following points: 

1. What type of questionnaire is it? (Survey, etc.) 
2. A general description of the variable that the test measures. 
3. A description of the test length, then 1 time it takes to administer, the directions that are employed, anal how the testing administration differs from standardized methods of administration. 
4. A detailed description or definition of the subtests, if any. 
5. A thorough discussion of the instrument’s reliability. 
6. A thorough discussion of the instrument’s validity.

If your instrument does not have validity or reliability data, then your task is going to be even more difficult. In these cases, you will have to field test the instrument and demonstrate some index of validity or reliability. Typically, this field test will require one to two pages of explanation. You will have to write a mini-research paper on the field test which should contain the following: 

1. What subjects were used in the field test? (In many cases, the subjects that are used in the pre-test of a repeated measures design may suffice. 
2. What index of reliability was used? (For example, split-half, test-retest, etc.) 
3. What index of validity was used? (For example, construct, content, etc.) 
4. What was the result of the field test and what did you conclude? 

As a general reminder, keep it simple. The more complicated and convoluted your research becomes, the longer it will take you to complete the project and get that all-important degree.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How to evaluate the project?

Evaluating the Project  The project should be evaluated at two levels. The first of these levels is the text and the logic of the presentation. The second level of evaluation should focus on the student’s mastery of the material. There are certain minimum requirements that the project or thesis must meet before it should be considered for acceptance. These minimal requirements deal with the manner of presentation of the project problem, its parameters, and analysis. To facilitate the examination of a project, I’ve provided a comprehensive checklist and inventory of the minimal requirements. For example: Is the topic area of the study clearly specified early in the text (within the first two pages)?  Is the topic area of the project derived from or cast into its historical perspective?  Are the major independent and dependent variables logically derived and their importance clearly evident?  Is the specific problem that the...
Post a Comment
Read more

How to write statement of the null hypotheses?

Introduction to the Chapter  The introduction to Chapter 3 should be no more than half a page in length. This section should present the general purpose of the third chapter and describe for the reader the general layout of the sections that follow.  Chapter 3 will present the methods and procedures of the study. For the purpose of the presentation, the chapter has been divided into five sections, namely, description of the null hypotheses, description of the subjects, description of the research instrumentation, description of the procedures, and treatment of the data.  Statement of the Null-Hypotheses  This section of the chapter should contain a list of all of the null-hypotheses, which are to be tested in the study. You should not present an alternative, directional, hypotheses in this section of the chapter since they are incapable of being tested statistically.  A null hypothesis is a statement of this type:  “There will be no sign...
Post a Comment
Read more

How to write review of the hypothesis?

Review of the Hypothesis  The review of the hypotheses section in chapter five is also an easy task. All that is needed is a restatement of the hypotheses that was presented in chapter three. Simply realist your hypotheses here. Begin with an introductory phrase like this “The null-hypotheses posed for testing in the study are listed below.”  Review of the Methods  The review of the methods section of the fifth chapter should be two to three pages in length. In essence, this two to three-page section is a summary of the methods chapter of the project. You might begin by completing the following sentence: “The subjects used in the study…..”  Make sure that you cover the following points:  How many subjects were used;  How were they divided into groups;  With what and by whom was the subject tested; and  What were the levels of the independent variables? (Stated another way, what did the experimental subjects participate in that t...
Post a Comment
Read more