Skip to main content

Think before start selecting a Topic

What is the discussion?

Discussion 

The major task of the discussion chapter is to discuss how the findings integrate into the body of literature reviewed. The theories and studies reviewed in the literature review chapter give cause to expect certain findings. In the discussion chapter, the reader is reminded of the findings that turned out as predicted and how these findings extend the body of knowledge a bit further. The findings that lend support to one side of a controversy are discussed, as are those that lend support to a particular conceptualization or definition of a concept. Findings that challenge existing theory or are unexpected are also valuable and require explanation. 

Many students find discussion chapter difficult to write because the emphasis is different than the previous chapters. In the previous chapters, the emphasis is on reporting the thinking and the research of others. While one does engage in original thinking in these chapters, this original thought is channeled into framing the research questions and the logical argument. 
One’s original thoughts must be buttressed in the findings and opinions of others. In these earlier chapters, there is no place for the student’s own opinions.

However, in the discussion chapter, the rules change somewhat. The student is expected to form an opinion about the findings and speculate about the causes of unexpected results. As always, opinions are more credible if backed by the findings of others but there is more room for the student’s own opinions. 

Also in the discussion chapter, it is appropriate to discuss any limitations in the study, especially those that were not obvious at the time of design but became apparent during the execution of the study. Suggestions for improvements in design that could be made by future researchers also belong here. Issues raised by this study point to a new direction for future research should be highlighted. 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to evaluate the project?

Evaluating the Project  The project should be evaluated at two levels. The first of these levels is the text and the logic of the presentation. The second level of evaluation should focus on the student’s mastery of the material. There are certain minimum requirements that the project or thesis must meet before it should be considered for acceptance. These minimal requirements deal with the manner of presentation of the project problem, its parameters, and analysis. To facilitate the examination of a project, I’ve provided a comprehensive checklist and inventory of the minimal requirements. For example: Is the topic area of the study clearly specified early in the text (within the first two pages)?  Is the topic area of the project derived from or cast into its historical perspective?  Are the major independent and dependent variables logically derived and their importance clearly evident?  Is the specific problem that the...

How to write statement of the null hypotheses?

Introduction to the Chapter  The introduction to Chapter 3 should be no more than half a page in length. This section should present the general purpose of the third chapter and describe for the reader the general layout of the sections that follow.  Chapter 3 will present the methods and procedures of the study. For the purpose of the presentation, the chapter has been divided into five sections, namely, description of the null hypotheses, description of the subjects, description of the research instrumentation, description of the procedures, and treatment of the data.  Statement of the Null-Hypotheses  This section of the chapter should contain a list of all of the null-hypotheses, which are to be tested in the study. You should not present an alternative, directional, hypotheses in this section of the chapter since they are incapable of being tested statistically.  A null hypothesis is a statement of this type:  “There will be no sign...

How to write review of the hypothesis?

Review of the Hypothesis  The review of the hypotheses section in chapter five is also an easy task. All that is needed is a restatement of the hypotheses that was presented in chapter three. Simply realist your hypotheses here. Begin with an introductory phrase like this “The null-hypotheses posed for testing in the study are listed below.”  Review of the Methods  The review of the methods section of the fifth chapter should be two to three pages in length. In essence, this two to three-page section is a summary of the methods chapter of the project. You might begin by completing the following sentence: “The subjects used in the study…..”  Make sure that you cover the following points:  How many subjects were used;  How were they divided into groups;  With what and by whom was the subject tested; and  What were the levels of the independent variables? (Stated another way, what did the experimental subjects participate in that t...