Skip to main content

Think before start selecting a Topic

What is the discussion?

Discussion 

The major task of the discussion chapter is to discuss how the findings integrate into the body of literature reviewed. The theories and studies reviewed in the literature review chapter give cause to expect certain findings. In the discussion chapter, the reader is reminded of the findings that turned out as predicted and how these findings extend the body of knowledge a bit further. The findings that lend support to one side of a controversy are discussed, as are those that lend support to a particular conceptualization or definition of a concept. Findings that challenge existing theory or are unexpected are also valuable and require explanation. 

Many students find discussion chapter difficult to write because the emphasis is different than the previous chapters. In the previous chapters, the emphasis is on reporting the thinking and the research of others. While one does engage in original thinking in these chapters, this original thought is channeled into framing the research questions and the logical argument. 
One’s original thoughts must be buttressed in the findings and opinions of others. In these earlier chapters, there is no place for the student’s own opinions.

However, in the discussion chapter, the rules change somewhat. The student is expected to form an opinion about the findings and speculate about the causes of unexpected results. As always, opinions are more credible if backed by the findings of others but there is more room for the student’s own opinions. 

Also in the discussion chapter, it is appropriate to discuss any limitations in the study, especially those that were not obvious at the time of design but became apparent during the execution of the study. Suggestions for improvements in design that could be made by future researchers also belong here. Issues raised by this study point to a new direction for future research should be highlighted. 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Analysis part of the thesis

The purpose of this is to present the results of the analysis of the data. The presentation should be in sufficient detail to enable the reader to judge the adequacy of the analysis.  If you examine the data analysis section of the project, you will find that two characteristic styles are used in the presentation. The first style, which I will refer to as the “hypothesis analysis” style, typically divides the chapter into sections which correspond to the hypotheses. In this manner of presentation, the hypothesis is presented, followed by the summary of the statistics relative to the hypothesis, and concluded with a statement which summarizes whether or not the hypothesis was rejected. In the second style of presentation, which I will refer to as the “analysis by instruments” style, the data are presented in various sections which correspond to the dependent variables (research instruments) used in the design.  With this style of presentation, the data are summ...

How to evaluate the project?

Evaluating the Project  The project should be evaluated at two levels. The first of these levels is the text and the logic of the presentation. The second level of evaluation should focus on the student’s mastery of the material. There are certain minimum requirements that the project or thesis must meet before it should be considered for acceptance. These minimal requirements deal with the manner of presentation of the project problem, its parameters, and analysis. To facilitate the examination of a project, I’ve provided a comprehensive checklist and inventory of the minimal requirements. For example: Is the topic area of the study clearly specified early in the text (within the first two pages)?  Is the topic area of the project derived from or cast into its historical perspective?  Are the major independent and dependent variables logically derived and their importance clearly evident?  Is the specific problem that the...

Think before start selecting a Topic

1. The topic should reflect your previous studies and experience. It should be related to your completed courses; your other research; and your political, cultural, or religious experience. 2. The necessary sources should be materially accessible. You should be near enough to the sources for convenient access, and you should have the permission you need to access them. 3. The necessary sources should be manageable. In other words, you should have the ability, experience, and background knowledge needed to understand the sources. 4. You should have some experience with the methodological framework that you will use in the thesis. For example, if your thesis topic requires you to analyze a Bach violin sonata, you should be versed in music theory and analysis.