Skip to main content

Think before start selecting a Topic

How to write description of the procedures?

Description of the Procedures 

The description of the procedures may be a long and involved section of the chapter if elaborate independent variables or elaborate instruments, other than test instruments, are involved. On the other hand, the procedures may be short and concise if these conditions do not apply. 

The procedures should specify, step by step, how you went about data collection. This section should be written in sufficient detail so that the reader could replicate the procedures. You may find it advantageous to maintain a research diary of dates and events. 

Your procedures section should include a discussion of the following points: 

  1. When, where, and by whom was the testing done? (If the tests were not given by standardized procedures then how were they deviated from and what possible effects might this departure have on the results?) 
  2. How were the groups separated into various sub-groupings? 
  3. What levels of the independent variables were used and how did you establish the levels (based on what criteria)? 
  4. If your study required judges or raters, then how were they selected, how were they trained, how did you arrive at the number of judges you used, what were their qualifications, how did you determine the reliability of your judges, and how did you control for differences in the biases of the judges? 
  5. If any types of apparatus, simulations or games were used in the study, then describe them and, if applicable, include wiring diagrams, schematic drawings, and materials used. 
  6. If you design is a repeated measures type, requiring for example pre-tests and post-tests, then describe how you arrived at the period between testing and how, if any, the testing differed. 
  7. If you were working within an organization and permission was needed to conduct the study, then how did you go about obtaining the permission, what stipulations were placed on the research by the participating organization, and how might those stipulations have affected the data collection. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Analysis part of the thesis

The purpose of this is to present the results of the analysis of the data. The presentation should be in sufficient detail to enable the reader to judge the adequacy of the analysis.  If you examine the data analysis section of the project, you will find that two characteristic styles are used in the presentation. The first style, which I will refer to as the “hypothesis analysis” style, typically divides the chapter into sections which correspond to the hypotheses. In this manner of presentation, the hypothesis is presented, followed by the summary of the statistics relative to the hypothesis, and concluded with a statement which summarizes whether or not the hypothesis was rejected. In the second style of presentation, which I will refer to as the “analysis by instruments” style, the data are presented in various sections which correspond to the dependent variables (research instruments) used in the design.  With this style of presentation, the data are summ...

How to evaluate the project?

Evaluating the Project  The project should be evaluated at two levels. The first of these levels is the text and the logic of the presentation. The second level of evaluation should focus on the student’s mastery of the material. There are certain minimum requirements that the project or thesis must meet before it should be considered for acceptance. These minimal requirements deal with the manner of presentation of the project problem, its parameters, and analysis. To facilitate the examination of a project, I’ve provided a comprehensive checklist and inventory of the minimal requirements. For example: Is the topic area of the study clearly specified early in the text (within the first two pages)?  Is the topic area of the project derived from or cast into its historical perspective?  Are the major independent and dependent variables logically derived and their importance clearly evident?  Is the specific problem that the...

Think before start selecting a Topic

1. The topic should reflect your previous studies and experience. It should be related to your completed courses; your other research; and your political, cultural, or religious experience. 2. The necessary sources should be materially accessible. You should be near enough to the sources for convenient access, and you should have the permission you need to access them. 3. The necessary sources should be manageable. In other words, you should have the ability, experience, and background knowledge needed to understand the sources. 4. You should have some experience with the methodological framework that you will use in the thesis. For example, if your thesis topic requires you to analyze a Bach violin sonata, you should be versed in music theory and analysis.