Skip to main content

Think before start selecting a Topic

What is the importance of correct citation?


In a thesis or project, every statement must be substantiated by citing its source. Student often has a tendency to make statements or sometimes sweeping generalizations without providing the supporting documentation. This is an especially common occurrence when the project subject is one with which the student has considerable familiarity through clinical experience. These statements may be accepted as fact by those knowledgeable in that field and it doesn’t occur to students that these assertions must be backed with citations. A few examples of this type of statement are ” intellectual capital = competence × commitment.”; “Organizations around the world are increasingly being confronted with complex, intractable problems”; “Changing the nature of the composition of ages has a big impact on the education system.”. As self-evident as these types of statements may be, for the project they require the substantiation of one or more citations. Without citations, the work lacks credibility.

The other important issue related to citations is that scholars are expected to credit the source of ideas. For example, if you report one author’s critique of another’s work, you can not report the critical analysis as if it were your own. To do so would amount to plagiarism.

References to the work of others can take three forms. The author and year can be mentioned directly in the text: proposed by Ulrich (1998): intellectual capital = competence × commitment.

If an author’s ideas or work is discussed but the author is not mentioned directly in the text, the author can be cited at the end of the sentence or at the end of the paragraph in a lengthy discussion:

Organizations around the world are increasingly being confronted with complex, intractable problems (Hall, 2008).

When a direct quotation is used, the page number is included in the citation. Short quotations may be included with a paragraph; while longer quotations should be presented in an indented, single spaced block.

Graham (2003, p. 112) noted: 
Changing nature of the composition of ages has a big impact on the education system.

Please refer for more information  http://www.thesistrainer.com/p/do-citation.html

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to evaluate the project?

Evaluating the Project  The project should be evaluated at two levels. The first of these levels is the text and the logic of the presentation. The second level of evaluation should focus on the student’s mastery of the material. There are certain minimum requirements that the project or thesis must meet before it should be considered for acceptance. These minimal requirements deal with the manner of presentation of the project problem, its parameters, and analysis. To facilitate the examination of a project, I’ve provided a comprehensive checklist and inventory of the minimal requirements. For example: Is the topic area of the study clearly specified early in the text (within the first two pages)?  Is the topic area of the project derived from or cast into its historical perspective?  Are the major independent and dependent variables logically derived and their importance clearly evident?  Is the specific problem that the...

How to write statement of the null hypotheses?

Introduction to the Chapter  The introduction to Chapter 3 should be no more than half a page in length. This section should present the general purpose of the third chapter and describe for the reader the general layout of the sections that follow.  Chapter 3 will present the methods and procedures of the study. For the purpose of the presentation, the chapter has been divided into five sections, namely, description of the null hypotheses, description of the subjects, description of the research instrumentation, description of the procedures, and treatment of the data.  Statement of the Null-Hypotheses  This section of the chapter should contain a list of all of the null-hypotheses, which are to be tested in the study. You should not present an alternative, directional, hypotheses in this section of the chapter since they are incapable of being tested statistically.  A null hypothesis is a statement of this type:  “There will be no sign...

How to write review of the hypothesis?

Review of the Hypothesis  The review of the hypotheses section in chapter five is also an easy task. All that is needed is a restatement of the hypotheses that was presented in chapter three. Simply realist your hypotheses here. Begin with an introductory phrase like this “The null-hypotheses posed for testing in the study are listed below.”  Review of the Methods  The review of the methods section of the fifth chapter should be two to three pages in length. In essence, this two to three-page section is a summary of the methods chapter of the project. You might begin by completing the following sentence: “The subjects used in the study…..”  Make sure that you cover the following points:  How many subjects were used;  How were they divided into groups;  With what and by whom was the subject tested; and  What were the levels of the independent variables? (Stated another way, what did the experimental subjects participate in that t...