Skip to main content

Think before start selecting a Topic

Post a Comment

How to prepare the bibliography?

The first step toward the production of a quality project or thesis is the development of an annotated bibliography of research in the topic area. By an annotated bibliography I mean a three to the four-page review of the major research in the topic area, followed by a three to four-page bibliography and a list of significant research questions which have been answered and research questions which remain unanswered. Hopefully, this annotated bibliography would be prepared some time in advance of the proposal preparation. My experience has indicated that the better projects or thesis proposals are prepared by those students who have a good grasp of the related literature and an understanding of significant research questions in the topic area of interest to them.

In order to formulate a significant research problem, it will be necessary to determine what problems have been addressed in the literature and what findings have been reported. Often students find that their topics have been addressed in the literature and their projects would add little to the understanding of the topic. Don’t let this disappoint you.
 
Each of the annotated bibliographic summaries should be summarized by addressing the following:
  • What was the principal question(s) addressed in the study?
  • What were the significant highlights of the research methods?
  • What did the results indicate?
As a rule of thumb, I suggest that a student review all the related literature for the past five to ten years, preparing summaries of the 20 to 30 most relevant articles. The completed annotated bibliography generally should be approximately 10-15 pages in length, five to six pages of summaries, five to six pages of answered and unanswered research questions, and three to four pages of additional, relevant references.

After your annotated bibliography has been prepared and reviewed, if necessary, by your intended committee, then you are ready to begin the preparation of the project proposal.

The proposal is intended to be an overview and suggestion for faculty consideration of a project
topic. The proposal should not be viewed as a binding, unchangeable document. The proposal should be viewed as the student’s well thought out offer of a project contract. The first draft of the proposal can be changed and modified by the student and the research committee.



Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How to evaluate the project?

Evaluating the Project  The project should be evaluated at two levels. The first of these levels is the text and the logic of the presentation. The second level of evaluation should focus on the student’s mastery of the material. There are certain minimum requirements that the project or thesis must meet before it should be considered for acceptance. These minimal requirements deal with the manner of presentation of the project problem, its parameters, and analysis. To facilitate the examination of a project, I’ve provided a comprehensive checklist and inventory of the minimal requirements. For example: Is the topic area of the study clearly specified early in the text (within the first two pages)?  Is the topic area of the project derived from or cast into its historical perspective?  Are the major independent and dependent variables logically derived and their importance clearly evident?  Is the specific problem that the...
Post a Comment
Read more

How to write statement of the null hypotheses?

Introduction to the Chapter  The introduction to Chapter 3 should be no more than half a page in length. This section should present the general purpose of the third chapter and describe for the reader the general layout of the sections that follow.  Chapter 3 will present the methods and procedures of the study. For the purpose of the presentation, the chapter has been divided into five sections, namely, description of the null hypotheses, description of the subjects, description of the research instrumentation, description of the procedures, and treatment of the data.  Statement of the Null-Hypotheses  This section of the chapter should contain a list of all of the null-hypotheses, which are to be tested in the study. You should not present an alternative, directional, hypotheses in this section of the chapter since they are incapable of being tested statistically.  A null hypothesis is a statement of this type:  “There will be no sign...
Post a Comment
Read more

How to write review of the hypothesis?

Review of the Hypothesis  The review of the hypotheses section in chapter five is also an easy task. All that is needed is a restatement of the hypotheses that was presented in chapter three. Simply realist your hypotheses here. Begin with an introductory phrase like this “The null-hypotheses posed for testing in the study are listed below.”  Review of the Methods  The review of the methods section of the fifth chapter should be two to three pages in length. In essence, this two to three-page section is a summary of the methods chapter of the project. You might begin by completing the following sentence: “The subjects used in the study…..”  Make sure that you cover the following points:  How many subjects were used;  How were they divided into groups;  With what and by whom was the subject tested; and  What were the levels of the independent variables? (Stated another way, what did the experimental subjects participate in that t...
Post a Comment
Read more