Skip to main content

Think before start selecting a Topic

What is the preliminary proposal?

The preliminary proposal is best thought of as an extended abstract of the proposed project. It need not be lengthy; three to ten pages should be sufficient to present the logic of the plan. The primary effort is not in the writing of this document; instead, the labor involved is in reading the research literature and using what is learned to create a workable project. The purpose of this document is to assure that you have a workable idea before you invest numerous hours writing up a poorly thought out proposal draft. This forces you to do your thinking up front and in advance.

The preliminary proposal (done in the first month or first half of your project course) should contain the key points of information that will allow your Chairperson to evaluate the proposed work. Well chosen information will present your project more impressively than an indiscriminate litter of facts. While a suggested guideline for presenting this information is provided, you may use your own judgment in modifying this outline. Because there are so many types of acceptable research, not all types fit easily into this outline. Some of the headings here may not apply while it may be necessary to include other headings or information in order to explain your work.

I. Introduction (Question)
II. Rationale
III. Theory
IV. Literature Review
V. Method
VI. Rival Explanations
VII. Reference List

I. The Introduction (Question) identifies what question you want your research to answer. For a project, it might be more appropriate to identify the skill you wish to develop and demonstrate and how you propose to accomplish that.

II. The Rationale section is an explanation of the logical framework of the study. As mentioned previously, a topic usually connects two or more concepts in a unique way. These concepts should be tied together in a logical way, as well. In this section, you present your concepts and their logical connections. If a friend asked you to explain your idea, you could do so in a paragraph or two using ordinary English. You would be able to state what your ideas are and how they tie together. This simple type of explanation is what is needed for the rationale section.

III. In the Theory section, you should state the theory along with its premises that guides you to expect certain findings. Research has to be related to a theory. This is described in more detail in the section explaining the formal proposal.

IV. The Literature review section identifies the topics you expect to cover in the formal proposal. It is not necessary to identify particular studies. What is presented is an overview of the areas of information to be discussed. You must be moderately well read on the subject to know what is important to include and what is irrelevant.

V. The Method section explains how you plan to gather the data. You are not expected to go into the level of detail that you are in your formal proposal. You should say how you would get subjects, the method of data collection (whether you will observe, interview, or test them, etc.) and roughly what method data analysis you would use. You must explain the basis of your choice of method. If you can
support your choice with literature citations, so much the better. If you are doing a project, you explain how you will evaluate a program, design a prototype. the program, etc.

VI. If you are doing the type of research that seeks to add new information to the field, you must anticipate Rival Explanations for the findings you are expecting. Considering rival explanations is the essence of research design. You should ask yourself and anyone who will talk with you about your project, ‘’What other explanations could there be?” You want to be able to gather your data in a way that rules out rival hypotheses.

VII. The Reference list gives the citations for any studies mentioned in the preliminary proposal. It is not a listing of studies you plan to include in the formal proposal. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to evaluate the project?

Evaluating the Project  The project should be evaluated at two levels. The first of these levels is the text and the logic of the presentation. The second level of evaluation should focus on the student’s mastery of the material. There are certain minimum requirements that the project or thesis must meet before it should be considered for acceptance. These minimal requirements deal with the manner of presentation of the project problem, its parameters, and analysis. To facilitate the examination of a project, I’ve provided a comprehensive checklist and inventory of the minimal requirements. For example: Is the topic area of the study clearly specified early in the text (within the first two pages)?  Is the topic area of the project derived from or cast into its historical perspective?  Are the major independent and dependent variables logically derived and their importance clearly evident?  Is the specific problem that the...

How to write statement of the null hypotheses?

Introduction to the Chapter  The introduction to Chapter 3 should be no more than half a page in length. This section should present the general purpose of the third chapter and describe for the reader the general layout of the sections that follow.  Chapter 3 will present the methods and procedures of the study. For the purpose of the presentation, the chapter has been divided into five sections, namely, description of the null hypotheses, description of the subjects, description of the research instrumentation, description of the procedures, and treatment of the data.  Statement of the Null-Hypotheses  This section of the chapter should contain a list of all of the null-hypotheses, which are to be tested in the study. You should not present an alternative, directional, hypotheses in this section of the chapter since they are incapable of being tested statistically.  A null hypothesis is a statement of this type:  “There will be no sign...

How to write review of the hypothesis?

Review of the Hypothesis  The review of the hypotheses section in chapter five is also an easy task. All that is needed is a restatement of the hypotheses that was presented in chapter three. Simply realist your hypotheses here. Begin with an introductory phrase like this “The null-hypotheses posed for testing in the study are listed below.”  Review of the Methods  The review of the methods section of the fifth chapter should be two to three pages in length. In essence, this two to three-page section is a summary of the methods chapter of the project. You might begin by completing the following sentence: “The subjects used in the study…..”  Make sure that you cover the following points:  How many subjects were used;  How were they divided into groups;  With what and by whom was the subject tested; and  What were the levels of the independent variables? (Stated another way, what did the experimental subjects participate in that t...