Skip to main content

Think before start selecting a Topic

How to write the description of the instrumentation section?



Description of the Research 

Instrumentation 


The description of the research instrumentation section of the project should present a detailed analysis and description of each questionnaire and test used in the project. Typically, two to three pages should be sufficient to describe each questionnaire. 

For each questionnaire, you should discuss each of the following points: 

1. What type of questionnaire is it? (Survey, etc.) 
2. A general description of the variable that the test measures. 
3. A description of the test length, then 1 time it takes to administer, the directions that are employed, anal how the testing administration differs from standardized methods of administration. 
4. A detailed description or definition of the subtests, if any. 
5. A thorough discussion of the instrument’s reliability. 
6. A thorough discussion of the instrument’s validity.

If your instrument does not have validity or reliability data, then your task is going to be even more difficult. In these cases, you will have to field test the instrument and demonstrate some index of validity or reliability. Typically, this field test will require one to two pages of explanation. You will have to write a mini-research paper on the field test which should contain the following: 

1. What subjects were used in the field test? (In many cases, the subjects that are used in the pre-test of a repeated measures design may suffice. 
2. What index of reliability was used? (For example, split-half, test-retest, etc.) 
3. What index of validity was used? (For example, construct, content, etc.) 
4. What was the result of the field test and what did you conclude? 

As a general reminder, keep it simple. The more complicated and convoluted your research becomes, the longer it will take you to complete the project and get that all-important degree.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Analysis part of the thesis

The purpose of this is to present the results of the analysis of the data. The presentation should be in sufficient detail to enable the reader to judge the adequacy of the analysis.  If you examine the data analysis section of the project, you will find that two characteristic styles are used in the presentation. The first style, which I will refer to as the “hypothesis analysis” style, typically divides the chapter into sections which correspond to the hypotheses. In this manner of presentation, the hypothesis is presented, followed by the summary of the statistics relative to the hypothesis, and concluded with a statement which summarizes whether or not the hypothesis was rejected. In the second style of presentation, which I will refer to as the “analysis by instruments” style, the data are presented in various sections which correspond to the dependent variables (research instruments) used in the design.  With this style of presentation, the data are summ...

How to evaluate the project?

Evaluating the Project  The project should be evaluated at two levels. The first of these levels is the text and the logic of the presentation. The second level of evaluation should focus on the student’s mastery of the material. There are certain minimum requirements that the project or thesis must meet before it should be considered for acceptance. These minimal requirements deal with the manner of presentation of the project problem, its parameters, and analysis. To facilitate the examination of a project, I’ve provided a comprehensive checklist and inventory of the minimal requirements. For example: Is the topic area of the study clearly specified early in the text (within the first two pages)?  Is the topic area of the project derived from or cast into its historical perspective?  Are the major independent and dependent variables logically derived and their importance clearly evident?  Is the specific problem that the...

Think before start selecting a Topic

1. The topic should reflect your previous studies and experience. It should be related to your completed courses; your other research; and your political, cultural, or religious experience. 2. The necessary sources should be materially accessible. You should be near enough to the sources for convenient access, and you should have the permission you need to access them. 3. The necessary sources should be manageable. In other words, you should have the ability, experience, and background knowledge needed to understand the sources. 4. You should have some experience with the methodological framework that you will use in the thesis. For example, if your thesis topic requires you to analyze a Bach violin sonata, you should be versed in music theory and analysis.